ENOSH separates editorial quality decisions from publication-ethics investigations and maintains documented routes for appeals, corrections and post-publication action.
Scope, relevance, completeness, basic integrity, rights and ethics readiness.
Normally at least two qualified reviewers for research-focused books, double-anonymized where practicable.
Reasoned decisions record reviewer comments, revisions and conflicts.
Authors, reviewers and editors disclose conflicts.
Unpublished material is confidential and not used for unauthorized AI training.
Correction, expression of concern or retraction when warranted.
Authors may request reconsideration when they identify a substantive procedural or factual issue.
